Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> Surveyor checks these after GIS review <br /> 4../'Math check each lot and add all parts to be sure totals are correct. <br /> 471:roes the proposed CSM fit with the parcel map, if available? <br /> ✓Are all structures,bodies of water,wetlands, slopes over 20%, floodplain areas,recorded easements and covenants <br /> don a site and adjoiners shown?BC Ord. 58-52 (b) <br /> oes the CSM cross a section line,40 line or Gov't Lot line?If so,make sure the corresponding data is shown. <br /> RPL Review—Surveyor/Zoning looks into any issues <br /> x Reconciles with Real Property Listing—Comments -tax in 350n <br /> x,Does this CSM cross the exterior boundary of a recorded plat?236.34(1) <br /> - Are additional parcels being created? <br /> - Are owner's certificates from all parties of interest included? <br /> - Has the CSM been approved by all approving authorities like a plat? <br /> Is it monumented the same as a plat with bigger monuments at corners? <br /> NO Has there been an adjacent CSM recorded with 4 parcels of 1 %2 acres each or less within a period of 5 years? <br /> 236.02(12) <br /> N, Is the parcel in MFL? <br /> No Does CSM change or cross school or other taxing districts? <br /> x Parcel Identification Number(s): p7-pag-a-AO-0,-\3-8 o5-063-o Ool <br /> K. Lot Number with improvements—Comments 1„0} i tag Trap is <br /> Treasurer Review—(Let Surveyor know about delinquency) <br /> Treasurer Check for Taxes owed -"Taos t2' t etaYI , <br /> et MgAery-- ,-Ic.e.., ----frta;L' eC id- --3/;,_V, 2o,Di <br /> SIGNATURE OF REVIEWER: ' DATE: 0---6/Z0Z1 <br /> \production\SURVEY\MISC ITEMS\Review Docs\CSM checksheet May_2018 <br />