Laserfiche WebLink
1�tIf a private road is proposed make sure"Road"isn't used in the name.Use Lane,Drive,Path,Trail, <br /> Way,Circle,etc.to signify a private road. <br /> (a If a private road is proposed,has the private road sign fee been paid? <br /> // Surveyor checks these after GIS review <br /> Math check each lot and add all parts to be sure totals are correct. <br /> �s the proposed CSM fit with the parcel map, if available? <br /> _A�allctures,bodies of water,wetlands,slopes over 20%, floodplain areas,recorded easements <br /> ants on the site and adjoiners shown?BC Ord. 58-52(b) <br /> oes the CSM cross a section line,40 line or Gov't Lot line?If so,make sure the corresponding data <br /> is shown. <br /> RPL Review—Surveyor looks into any issues <br /> Reconciles with Real Property Listing—Comments <br /> NDoes this CSM cross the exterior boundary of a recorded plat?236.34(1) <br /> VHasAre additional parcels being created? <br /> re owner's certificates from all parties of interest included? <br /> the CSM been approved by all approving authorities like a plat? <br /> s it monumented the same as a plat with bigger monuments at corners? <br /> Has there been an adjacent CSM recorded with 4 parcels of 1 '/2 acres each or less within a period of <br /> \ <br /> 5 years? 236.02(12) <br /> Is the parcel in MFL? <br /> N Does CSM change or cross school or other taxing districts? <br /> 1/Parcel Identification Number is <br /> ✓Lot Number with improvements—Comments�_i,! i <br /> O/zoll, <br /> Treasurer Review—(Let Surveyor know about delinquency) 1 <br /> /Treasurer Check for Taxes owed oZU t) f sip-c-", � t, � �/3 / l b <br /> SIGNATURE OF REVIEWER: DATE: S �� <br /> \production\SURVEY\M1SC rrEMS\Review Docs\CSM checkshed 12-22-2014 <br />