Laserfiche WebLink
3. No Harm to Public Interests(Item 3 to be completed by the applicant) <br /> • <br /> A variance may not be granted which results in harm to public interests. In applying this test,the BOA must consider <br /> the impacts of the proposal and the cumulative impacts of similar projects on the interests of the neighbors,the entire <br /> community,and the general public. These interests are listed as objectives in the purpose statement of our ordinance <br /> and may include: <br /> • Public health,safety,and welfare <br /> • Water quality <br /> • Fish and wildlife habitat <br /> • Natural scenic beauty <br /> • Minimization of property damages <br /> • Provision of efficient public facilities and utilities <br /> • Achievement of eventual compliance for nonconforming uses,structures,and lot <br /> • Any other public interest issues <br /> When determining whether a harm to public interest exists,the property as a whole is considered rather than a portion <br /> of the parcel. The property owner bears the burden of proving no harm to public interest. Explain how no harm to <br /> public interest exists: <br /> L) *(4):ti-Cx * . afehoVc of k- e hcz✓ toe- wOc.2ld br vst <br /> or cxks-irin driveLoa/ (4)(4 no all i4 tonl ac .es6 +0 A2,4411 Shore.RJ�-ase . <br /> 0 6Vet'al( (11c-4-0J a ( g4k.Jf Ls and -One- (d U n�' <br /> be. aE l 6A-0-1-JeA art -kL LooneaeA akr-ect.i-- St'.©T oor fC-tp_k-1"/ Cora(( <br /> A ' enS®LA, T-S atea ct.ci-con45 for to 06VAlt hatotVine-toicillq of oar froPeetT <br /> Burnett County Ordinance purpose (to be completed by BOA members): <br /> Purpose(s)of standard from which variance is requested (to be completed by BOA members): <br /> Note:While Wisconsin Statutes do not specifically prohibit use variances, there are a number of practical reasons why <br /> they are not advisable: <br /> • Unnecessary hardship must be established in order to qualify for a variance. This means that without the <br /> variance,no reasonable use can be made of the property. <br /> • Many applications for use variances are in fact administrative appeals. Often the BOA is asked to determine <br /> whether a proposed use is included within the meaning of a particular permitted or conditional use or whether it <br /> is sufficiently distinct as to exclude it from the ordinance language. Such a decision is not a use variance but an <br /> appeal of the administrator's interpretation of ordinance text. <br /> • Zoning amendments are a more comprehensive approach than use variances. Elected officials consider the <br /> larger land area to avoid piecemeal decisions that may lead to conflict between adjacent incompatible uses or <br /> may undermine land use/comprehensive plan and ordinance objectives. Towns have meaningful input(veto <br /> power)for zoning amendments to general zoning ordinances. <br /> o Zoning map amendments can change zoning district boundaries so as to allow uses provided in other <br /> zoning districts. <br /> o Zoning text amendments can add(or delete)permitted or conditional uses allowed in each zoning <br /> district. <br /> Page 6 of 9 <br /> Burnett County, WI Variance Application—Rev 12/2020 <br />