My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015/10/07 - LAND USE - VAR - Other
Burnett-County
>
Property Files
>
TOWN OF JACKSON
>
6095
>
2015/10/07 - LAND USE - VAR - Other
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2020 10:16:52 PM
Creation date
9/29/2017 10:44:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Property Files v2
Document Date
10/7/2015
Document Type 1
LAND USE
Document Type 2
VAR
Document Type 3
Other
Tax ID
6095
Pin Number
07-012-2-40-15-36-5 05-001-016000
Legacy Pin
012423604100
Municipality
TOWN OF JACKSON
Owner Name
GOPHER HOLE PROPERTIES LLC
Property Address
3680 S PENINSULA RD
City
WEBSTER
State
WI
Zip
54893
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Describe variance requested: Add onto non-conforming strueturr (bedroom) behind <br /> the existing cabin. Place new septic system (holding tank), <br /> Describe current use and improvements(Er. ResidenliullRecreution; Cahinlgurgge): <br /> Cabin / bedrooms <br /> Provide description and location of all nonconforming structures and uses on the property: <br /> All of the property is non-conforming for lake setbacks So the cabin, <br /> garage and shed are all non-conforming. See sketch. <br /> Provide Burnett County Ordinance standard from which variance is being sought(section number and text): <br /> Article X: Sec. 30-677 <br /> Use of structures which are not conforming to shoreland setbacks- <br /> Alternatives: <br /> e backcAlternatives: (To be completed hr the applicant): <br /> Describe alternatives to your proposal such as other locations, designs, and construction techniques. Examples of <br /> alternatives would be: reducing the size of request. moving the structure to a different area, or expanding upward instead <br /> of laterally. Attach a site map showing alternatives you considered in each category below. <br /> a. Alternatives you considered that comply with existing standards. If you find such an alternative,you can move <br /> forward with this option with a regular permit. If you reject compliant alternatives, provide the reasons you <br /> rejected them. <br /> Building ve `cally. Structural limitations, more visible from lake <br /> and costs. <br /> b. Alternatives you considered that require a lesser variance and reasons you rejected them. If you reject such <br /> alternatives,provide the reasons you rejected them. <br /> None. Because of the site all options do not meet required setbacks <br /> The propsed additon is in the most centered locations of the narrai <br /> Page 3 of 9 <br /> Burnett County, WI Variance Application-Rev 3/2015 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.