Laserfiche WebLink
' Surveyor checks these after GIS review <br /> Z/Math check each lot and add all parts to be sure totals are correct. <br /> !/Does the proposed CSM fit with the parcel map, if available? <br /> t Are all structures,bodies of water, wetlands, slopes over 20%, floodplain areas, recorded easements and covenants <br /> on the site and adjoiners shown?BC Ord. 58-52 (b) <br /> / Does the CSM cross a section line, 40 line or Gov't Lot line?If so, make sure the corresponding data is shown. <br /> RPL Review-Surveyor/Zoning looks into any issues <br /> ,,. Reconciles with Real Property Listing-Comments Tay, Ip aa47a. 4 aa4-i <br /> N. Does this CSM cross the exterior boundary of a recorded plat?236.34 (1) <br /> - Are additional parcels being created? <br /> - Are owner's certificates from all parties of interest included? <br /> - Has the CSM been approved by all approving authorities like a plat? <br /> - Is it monumented the same as a plat with bigger monuments at corners? <br /> Na Has there been an adjacent CSM recorded with 4 parcels of 1 '/2 acres each or less within a period of 5 years? <br /> 236.02 (12) <br /> No Is the parcel in MFL? <br /> ^Jo Does CSM change or cross school or other taxing districts? <br /> x Parcel Identification Number(s):p1-03a-a-4 t-11-0^24- - 64-000-01000 <br /> o1-O3a,-ca-41- 17-a4-4 04-c)0O -0\1000 <br /> x Lot Number with improvements-Comments 2,or11r, Lot a ana reindinder crsrhir' tmprtxjen-ievd-s. <br /> Treasurer Reviewet Surveyor know about delinquency) <br /> Treasurer Check for Taxes d �Ye <br /> trix <br /> oiti(0 Ai `• -, IL (eiat/ b,?/ <br /> -4110111 .lQ 7i �Z� <br /> SIGNATURE OF REVIEWER: s� DATE: <br /> \production\SURVEY\MISC ITEMS\Review Docs\CSM checksheet May_2018 <br />