Laserfiche WebLink
Surveyor checks these after GIS review <br /> IX:71 th check each lot and add all parts to be sure totals are correct. <br /> Ares the proposed CSM fit with the parcel map, if available? <br /> e all structures,bodies of water, wetlands, slopes over 20%, floodplain areas, recorded easements and covenants <br /> o e site and adjoiners shown?BC Ord. 58-52 (b) <br /> Does the CSM cross a section line,40 line or Gov't Lot line? If so, make sure the corresponding data is shown. <br /> RPL Review-Surveyor/Zoning looks into any issues <br /> X Reconciles with Real Property Listing-Comments -1-8), kr /7 kk 1110 -nog <br /> N, z Does this CSM cross the exterior boundary of a recorded plat? 236.34 (1) <br /> - Are additional parcels being created? <br /> - Are owner's certificates from all parties of interest included? <br /> - Has the CSM been approved by all approving authorities like a plat? <br /> - Is it monumented the same as a plat with bigger monuments at corners? <br /> No Has there been an adjacent CSM recorded with 4 parcels of 1 'h acres each or less within a period of 5 years? <br /> 236.02 (12) <br /> N„ Is the parcel in MFL? <br /> No Does CSM change or cross school or other taxing districts? <br /> x Parcel Identification Number(s): 0-1-oia-a-40-i5-►a-5 k5- 400-051000 <br /> o1-O,a_a, -4o- ►S- ►3 -5 L5- 400 -055000 <br /> 01 -oka-a.-40-15- ka-5 15- 400 -cyt000 <br /> „ Lot Number with improvements-Comments Lat. 1+Q \-noe improOernents <br /> Treasurer Review-(Let Surveyor ow about delinqu ncy)� <br /> VTreasurer Check for Taxes owed J (LJi( C I %V(„ y CX-C• <br /> - l 'ot.. *te`eti167` 7/tl�D-1 <br /> SIGNATURE OF REVIEWER: F DATE: 713/7-4 Z/ <br /> \production\SURVEY\MISC ITEMS\Review Docs\CSM checksheet May_2018 <br />