Laserfiche WebLink
Surveyor checks these after GIS review <br /> �1/th check each lot and add all parts to be sure totals are correct. <br /> s the proposed CSM fit with the parcel map, if available? <br /> Are all structures,bodies of water, wetlands, slopes over 20%, floodplain areas, recorded easements and covenants <br /> on the site and adjoiners shown?BC Ord. 58-52 (b) <br /> AiteDoes the CSM cross a section line, 40 line or Gov't Lot line? If so, make sure the corresponding data is shown. <br /> RPL Review—Surveyor/Zoning looks into any issues <br /> I Reconciles with Real Property Listing—Comments <br /> N„ Does this CSM cross the exterior boundary of a recorded plat?236.34(1) <br /> - Are additional parcels being created? <br /> - Are owner's certificates from all parties of interest included? <br /> - Has the CSM been approved by all approving authorities like a plat? <br /> - Is it monumented the same as a plat with bigger monuments at corners? <br /> No Has there been an adjacent CSM recorded with 4 parcels of 1 'h acres each or less within a period of 5 years? <br /> 236.02 (12) <br /> Ne Is the parcel in MFL? <br /> 14, Does CSM change or cross school or other taxing districts? <br /> x Parcel Identification Number(s): Tex co 113aq <br /> x Lot Number with improvements—Comments Lcy} f2. has improrJezliettts <br /> Treasurer Review—(Let Surveyor know about� delinquency) <br /> Treasurer Check for Taxes ow d -Po r 4- f VU wile <br /> b.---m,,,,,,66-z, — G k '�, c s1- ;/l, l ad?, <br /> 0 <br /> SIGNATURE OF REVIEWER: , —2-+- DATE: U 2 a/ <br /> \production\SURVEY\MISC ITEMS\Review Docs\CSM checksheet May_2018 <br />