Laserfiche WebLink
f <br /> Surveyor checks these after GIS review <br /> Math check each lot and add all parts to be sure totals are correct. <br /> Voes the proposed CSM fit with the parcel map,if available? <br /> ✓ke all structures,bodies of water,wetlands, slopes over 20%, floodplain areas,recorded easements and covenants <br /> on the site and adjoiners shown?BC Ord. 58-52 (b) <br /> i4/Does the CSM cross a section line,40 line or Gov't Lot line?If so,make sure the corresponding data is shown. <br /> RPL Review—Surveyor/Zoning looks into any issues <br /> x Reconciles with Real Property Listing—Comments <br /> No Does this CSM cross the exterior boundary of a recorded plat?236.34(1) <br /> - Are additional parcels being created? <br /> Are owner's certificates from all parties of interest included? <br /> Has the CSM been approved by all approving authorities like a plat? <br /> • Is it monumented the same as a plat with bigger monuments at corners? <br /> Ni 0 Has there been an adjacent CSM recorded with 4 parcels of 1 %2 acres each or less within a period of 5 years? <br /> 236.02(12) <br /> Ni„ Is the parcel in MFL? <br /> NJ o Does CSM change or cross school or other taxing districts? <br /> x Parcel Identification Number(s): -/3341 -7309, '7308 <br /> x Lot Number with improvements—Comments c_orri917)5 \rnproUe yErfs <br /> Treasurer Review—(Let Surveyor know about delinquency) <br /> ✓Treasurer Check for Taxes owed I ca--4/ /D S -133i4 , 3 01 41- 73O S — 0-0d d <br /> cp iota,/a1 -2-2,e, ,... fa...Lei _444, ..."..,..,...6e . <br /> SIGNATURE OF REVIEWER: DATE: // l/249 °"'/ <br /> \production\SURVEY\MISC ITEMS\Review Docs\CSM checksheet May_2018 <br />