Laserfiche WebLink
Surveyor checks these after GIS review <br /> ath check each lot and add all parts to be sure totals are correct. <br /> Loes the proposed CSM fit with the parcel map, if available? <br /> all structures,bodies of water, wetlands, slopes over 20%, floodplain areas,recorded easements and covenants <br /> on the site and adjoiners shown?BC Ord. 58-52 (b) <br /> /ñDoes the CSM cross a section line, 40 line or Gov't Lot line? If so, make sure the corresponding data is shown. <br /> RPL Review—Surveyor/Zoning looks into any issues <br /> X Reconciles with Real Property Listing—Comments <br /> N, Does this CSM cross the exterior boundary of a recorded plat?236.34(1) <br /> I, Are additional parcels being created? <br /> I Are owner's certificates from all parties of interest included? <br /> ' Has the CSM been approved by all approving authorities like a plat? <br /> 7 Is it monumented the same as a plat with bigger monuments at corners? <br /> Isl. Has there been an adjacent CSM recorded with 4 parcels of 1 1/2 acres each or less within a period of 5 years? <br /> 236.02 (12) <br /> talo Is the parcel in MFL? <br /> Plo Does CSM change or cross school or other taxing districts? <br /> x Parcel Identification Number(s): Tax ID lO6t6 * I6It1 <br /> s Lot Number with improvements—Comments all lots appeal -4-0 IOe,Vacant" <br /> / Treasurer Review—(Let Surveyor ow about de inquency) <br /> /Treasurer Check for Taxes owed Ts(� aid to_ _ <br /> /Wi — 94 cR.- /Si- 7/. 0/ <br /> SIGNATURE OF REVIEWER: DATE: / /2_,,e7 ?/7___— <br /> \production\SURVEY\MISC ITEMS\Review Docs\CSM checksheet May_2018 <br />