Laserfiche WebLink
Surveyor checks these after GIS review <br /> ,,,Math check each lot and add all parts to be sure totals are correct. <br /> /7 Does the proposed CSM fit with the parcel map, if available? <br /> /"Ce all structures,bodies of water, wetlands, slopes over 20%, floodplain areas,recorded easements and covenants <br /> on the site and adjoiners shown?BC Ord. 58-52 (b) <br /> 1/ti Does the CSM cross a section line, 40 line or Gov't Lot line? If so, make sure the corresponding data is shown. <br /> RPL Review—Surveyor/Zoning looks into any issues <br /> x Reconciles with Real Property Listing—Comments <br /> ^(p Does this CSM cross the exterior boundary of a recorded plat?236.34 (1) <br /> - Are additional parcels being created? <br /> - Are owner's certificates from all parties of interest included? <br /> - Has the CSM been approved by all approving authorities like a plat? <br /> - Is it monumented the same as a plat with bigger monuments at corners? <br /> N. Has there been an adjacent CSM recorded with 4 parcels of 1 'h acres each or less within a period of 5 years? <br /> 236.02 (12) <br /> No Is the parcel in MFL? <br /> NJ, Does CSM change or cross school or other taxing districts? <br /> x Parcel Identification Number(s): ►3514 13` Io5 <br /> x Lot Number with improvements—Comments ' NI,ne <br /> Treasurer Review—(Let Surveyor know about delinquency) <br /> /Treasurer Check for Taxes owed rima.y. 1 /35 74/ i . <br /> .� 4-c.....,al. <br /> git mac' -LD /3.510 S P -rte d, z,zl8/aa ?Xi-- <br /> SIGNATURE <br /> OF REVIEWER: / -- �— DATE: Z ^ ZO Z? <br /> \production\SURVEY\MISC ITEMS\Review Docs\CSM checksheet May_2018 <br />