Laserfiche WebLink
Surveyor checks these after GIS review <br /> ✓lvlath check each lot and add all parts to be sure totals are correct. <br /> Does the proposed CSM fit with the parcel map, if available? <br /> 1/Are all structures,bodies of water, wetlands, slopes over 20%, floodplain areas,recorded easements and covenants <br /> o}i-the site and adjoiners shown?BC Ord. 58-52 (b) <br /> Does the CSM cross a section line, 40 line or Gov't Lot line?If so, make sure the corresponding data is shown. <br /> !�/ <br /> RPL Review—Surveyor/Zoning looks into any issues <br /> X Reconciles with Real Property Listing—Comments <br /> No Does this CSM cross the exterior boundary of a recorded plat?236.34(1) <br /> Are additional parcels being created? <br /> Are owner's certificates from all parties of interest included? <br /> Has the CSM been approved by all approving authorities like a plat? <br /> Is it monumented the same as a plat with bigger monuments at corners? <br /> NJ Has there been an adjacent CSM recorded with 4 parcels of 1 1/2 acres each or less within a period of 5 years? <br /> 236.02 (12) <br /> >c Is the parcel in MFL? <br /> k\io Does CSM change or cross school or other taxing districts? <br /> . Parcel Identification Number(s): AL:n 90 I Ic>'7 89 <br /> A Lot Number with improvements—Comments 1,10,Ne_ <br /> Treasurer Review—(Let Surveyor know about delinquency) <br /> Treasurer Check for Taxes owed 1/1l7za--' et,ce, —Al_ ,�tj�-ry . <br /> _ -64.. i1t,790 c d /1, 78`x. 3/ /aoa„), G <br /> l ......... <br /> SIGNATURE OF REVIEWER: -- DATE: 0/2-(9 <br /> \production\SURVEY\MISC ITEMS\Review Docs\CSM checksheet May_2018 <br />