Laserfiche WebLink
Surveyor checks these after GIS review <br /> I/Math check each lot and add all parts to be sure totals are correct. <br /> 1/"Does the proposed CSM fit with the parcel map, if available? <br /> �e all structures,bodies of water, wetlands, slopes over 20%, floodplain areas, recorded easements and covenants <br /> on the site and adjoiners shown?BC Ord. 58-52 (b) <br /> Does the CSM cross a section line, 40 line or Gov't Lot line?If so, make sure the corresponding data is shown. <br /> RPL Review—Surveyor/Zoning looks into any issues <br /> , Reconciles with Real Property Listing—Comments <br /> �o Does this CSM cross the exterior boundary of a recorded plat?236.34 (1) <br /> Are additional parcels being created? <br /> Are owner's certificates from all parties of interest included? <br /> Has the CSM been approved by all approving authorities like a plat? <br /> Is it monumented the same as a plat with bigger monuments at corners? <br /> Nj Has there been an adjacent CSM recorded with 4 parcels of 1 '/2 acres each or less within a period of 5 years? <br /> 236.02 (12) <br /> No Is the parcel in MFL? <br /> 1. Does CSM change or cross school or other taxing districts? <br /> X Parcel Identification Number(s): 33 4(06 <br /> Lot Number with improvements—Comments <br /> Treasurer Review—(Let Surveyor know about delinquency) <br /> Treasurer Check for Taxes owed �T 2 / 33 q(gyp G am, <br /> 4117 loth ShALD... <br /> SIGNATURE OF REVIEWER: DATE: 027002-7____- <br /> ) <br /> lA ir s CS 144 I's tw 5/7 i°to / <br /> ' /O 4 , Ocfcies /O/�-Z) �3 arc_e/l5Pv�� s ( � <br /> a llo 1,-) esz/ <br /> !i0 / '/ /5 /4‘c 4re kt-w1m 0,7L— <br /> i <br /> \production\SURVEY\MISC ITEMS\Review Docs\CSM checksheet May_2018 <br />