Laserfiche WebLink
Surveyor checks these after GIS review <br /> 1,44;:th check each lot and add all parts to be sure totals are correct. <br /> v Doe proposed CSM fit with the parcel map, if available? <br /> Are all structures,bodies of water, wetlands, slopes over 20%, floodplain areas,recorded easements and covenants <br /> on the site and adjoiners shown?BC Ord. 58-52 (b) <br /> /V//Does the CSM cross a section line, 40 line or Gov't Lot line?If so, make sure the corresponding data is shown. <br /> RPL Review—Surveyor/Zoning looks into any issues <br /> x Reconciles with Real Property Listing—Comments <br /> • Does this CSM cross the exterior boundary of a recorded plat?236.34(1) <br /> Are additional parcels being created? <br /> Are owner's certificates from all parties of interest included? <br /> Has the CSM been approved by all approving authorities like a plat? <br /> Is it monumented the same as a plat with bigger monuments at corners? <br /> • Has there been an adjacent CSM recorded with 4 parcels of 1 '/2 acres each or less within a period of 5 years? <br /> 236.02 (12) <br /> Nies Is the parcel in MFL? <br /> p/o Does CSM change or cross school or other taxing districts? <br /> N Parcel Identification Number(s): ala.53 <br /> ' Lot Number with improvements—Comments Now_ <br /> Treasurer Review—(Let Surveyor know about delinquency) <br /> Treasurer Check for Taxes owed ��jle-ate _�cz,�� ..�iw ,-/—e) <br /> rlit,y, I b c2l as3 /a/a.. 9-kr- <br /> _dais"' <br /> SIGNATURE OF REVIEWER: /�_ DATE: 64"70,e,Z 7-- <br /> \production\SURVEY\MISC ITEMS\Review Docs\CSM checksheet May_2018 <br />