Laserfiche WebLink
Surveyor checks these after GIS review <br /> Math check each lot and add all parts to be sure totals are correct. <br /> // Does the proposed CSM fit with the parcel map, if available? <br /> Are all structures,bodies of water,wetlands, slopes over 20%, floodplain areas, recorded easements and covenants <br /> n the site and adjoiners shown?BC Ord. 58-52 (b) <br /> Noesthe CSM cross a section line, 40 line or Gov't Lot line?If so,make sure the corresponding data is shown. <br /> 4_ <br /> RPL Review-Surveyor/Zoning looks into any issues <br /> x Reconciles with Real Property Listing-Comments <br /> N„ Does this CSM cross the exterior boundary of a recorded plat?236.34 (1) <br /> - Are additional parcels being created? <br /> Are owner's certificates from all parties of interest included? <br /> - Has the CSM been approved by all approving authorities like a plat? <br /> - Is it monumented the same as a plat with bigger monuments at corners? <br /> Nn Has there been an adjacent CSM recorded with 4 parcels of 1 '/2 acres each or less within a period of 5 years? <br /> 236.02 (12) <br /> No Is the parcel in MFL? <br /> No Does CSM change or cross school or other taxing districts? <br /> x Parcel Identification Number(s): aJa41, 2b23-1 i a-1,534. <br /> x Lot Number with improvements-Comments as Ark-tree lois have Icr c oOements <br /> Treasurer Review-(Let Surveyor ow about delinquenncy))�/ <br /> /Treasurer Check for es owed ��5 / es � 6(.� <br /> —nizda-1 — yielz.-` <br /> of Ai- /o/7/ 'i <br /> SIGNATURE OF REVIEWER: Ate. DATE: /V7.-49 ZZ- <br /> \production\SURVEY\MISC ITEMS\Review Docs\CSM checksheet May_2018 <br />