Laserfiche WebLink
Surveyor checks these after GIS review <br /> 4th check each lot and add all parts to be sure totals are correct. <br /> oethe proposed CSM fit with the parcel map, if available? <br /> Are all structures,bodies of water,wetlands, slopes over 20%, floodplain areas,recorded easements and covenants <br /> on the site and adjoiners shown?BC Ord. 58-52(b) <br /> iff#Ioes the CSM cross a section line,40 line or Gov't Lot line?If so,make sure the corresponding data is shown. <br /> ) <br /> RPL Review—Surveyor/Zoning looks into any issues <br /> x Reconciles with Real Property Listing—Comments <br /> No Does this CSM cross the exterior boundary of a recorded plat?236.34(1) <br /> Are additional parcels being created? <br /> Are owner's certificates from all parties of interest included? <br /> Has the CSM been approved by all approving authorities like a plat? <br /> Is it monumented the same as a plat with bigger monuments at corners? <br /> No Has there been an adjacent CSM recorded with 4 parcels of 1 %2 acres each or less within a period of 5 years? <br /> 236.02(12) <br /> No Is the parcel in MFL? <br /> /sin Does CSM change or cross school or other taxing districts? <br /> X Parcel Identification Number(s): 19811 <br /> )( Lot Number with improvements—Comments 8 4 3 <br /> Treasurer Review—(Let Surveyor know about delinquency) <br /> ✓Treasurer Check for Taxes owed "ime .2"'D /9p1/ �a A/ ---c — ./„ r <br /> OA 3/0140a. <br /> i <br /> SIGNATURE OF REVIEWER: I DATE: <br /> \production\SURVEY\MISC ITEMS\Review Docs\CSM checksheet May_2018 <br />