Laserfiche WebLink
Surveyor checks these after GIS review <br /> vl6th check each lot and add all parts to be sure totals are correct. <br /> Does the proposed CSM fit with the parcel map, if available? <br /> 1Are all structures,bodies of water,wetlands, slopes over 20%, floodplain areas,recorded easements and covenants <br /> n the site and adjoiners shown?BC Ord. 58-52(b) <br /> i'‘oes the CSM cross a section line,40 line or Gov't Lot line?If so,make sure the corresponding data is shown. <br /> RPL Review—Surveyor/Zoning looks into any issues <br /> x Reconciles with Real Property Listing—Comments <br /> No Does this CSM cross the exterior boundary of a recorded plat?236.34(1) <br /> Are additional parcels being created? <br /> Are owner's certificates from all parties of interest included? <br /> Has the CSM been approved by all approving authorities like a plat? <br /> Is it monumented the same as a plat with bigger monuments at corners? <br /> — Has there been an adjacent CSM recorded with 4 parcels of 1 Y2 acres each or less within a period of 5 years? <br /> 236.02(12) <br /> Is the parcel in MFL? <br /> — Does CSM change or cross school or other taxing districts? <br /> k Parcel Identification Number(s): 360/6 <br /> X Lot Number with improvements—Comments nom e <br /> / Treasurer Review—(Let Surveyor know about delinquency) �,Ce <br /> V �- <br /> Treasurer Check for Taxes owed �G,1(.�.� a-Le_Ida.;ateA- � 1-?..-00 7 ,.►.,G 6 9 <br /> 71.0 �, dlite- 'T .Y' 35 765; 3,9 7b 360409 v- 31,070. <br /> q,k) #.5-A„,... <br /> J <br /> , 3' <br /> SIGNATURE OF REVIEWER: BATE: 8//Y2-4-7e 2-- <br /> \production\SURVEY\MISC ITEMS\Review Docs\CSM checksheet May_2018 <br />