Laserfiche WebLink
Surveyor checks these after GIS review <br /> /Math check each lot and add all parts to be sure totals are correct. <br /> w/Does the proposed CSM fit with the parcel map, if available? <br /> l/ Are all structures,bodies of water, wetlands, slopes over 20%, floodplain areas,recorded easements and covenants <br /> on the site and adjoiners shown?BC Ord. 58-52 (b) <br /> ASIT Does the CSM cross a section line, 40 line or Gov't Lot line?If so, make sure the corresponding data is shown. <br /> RPL Review—Surveyor/Zoning looks into any issues <br /> x Reconciles with Real Property Listing—Comments <br /> No Does this CSM cross the exterior boundary of a recorded plat? 236.34 (1) <br /> Are additional parcels being created? <br /> Are owner's certificates from all parties of interest included? <br /> Has the CSM been approved by all approving authorities like a plat? <br /> Is it monumented the same as a plat with bigger monuments at corners? <br /> No Has there been an adjacent CSM recorded with 4 parcels of 1 Y2 acres each or less within a period of 5 years? <br /> 236.02 (12) <br /> No Is the parcel in MFL? <br /> No Does CSM change or cross school or other taxing districts? <br /> Parcel Identification Number(s): ap1t QS-710 <br /> )C Lot Number with improvements—Comments ►,.al- 1 <br /> Treasurer Review—(Let Surveyor know about delinquency) <br /> ✓Treasurer Check for Taxes owed 7).¢.. o?p'7/1 'Nr- .( 7/0 r1-4..¢.- 74.4.444 <br /> .....t.44,...,- �, 5111S1 <br /> 9/is/ . <br /> SIGNATURE OF REVIEWER: DATE: ` Z 77 Z,? <br /> \production\SURVEY\MISC ITEMS\Review Docs\CSM checksheet May_2018 <br />