Laserfiche WebLink
Criteria for granting a variance: <br /> 1) Unnecessary hardship is present because Ray & Dorothy are deceased and we <br /> need to sell their cabin and lot. We do not use the cabin and we do not have the <br /> time, energy, or finances to maintain the unused cabin and lot. <br /> 2) Unique features of this property prevent compliance with the terms of the <br /> ordinance; they include incorrect surveying by Anthony Thousands (the <br /> description written by Doug Crane supports this), the understanding that Ray & <br /> Dorothy owned the 100 foot lot for 42 years and that it was a sellable lot, two <br /> separate tax bills with incorrect information - maybe over paid for the same land <br /> for 42 years, and incorrect county maps showing parcels of land and cabins in <br /> the wrong places. <br /> 3) A variance will not be contrary to the public interest because we are maintaining <br /> the same number of lots and we are only switching the 150 feet from one side of <br /> the property to the other side of the property , keeping consistent the two lots, <br /> one at 150 feet. The larger lot could not be split in the future due to the new <br /> zoning requirements. <br />