Laserfiche WebLink
Surveyor checks these after GIS review <br /> / Math check each lot and add all parts to be sure totals are correct. <br /> Z.-"Does the proposed CSM fit with the parcel map, if available? <br /> Are all structures,bodies of water, wetlands, slopes over 20%, floodplain areas, recorded easements and covenants <br /> on the site and adjoiners shown?BC Ord. 58-52 (b) <br /> Does the CSM cross a section line, 40 line or Gov't Lot line?If so, make sure the corresponding data is shown. <br /> RPL Review—Surveyor/Zoning looks into any issues <br /> X Reconciles with Real Property Listing—Comments <br /> nit)Does this CSM cross the exterior boundary of a recorded plat? 236.34 (1) <br /> Are additional parcels being created? <br /> Are owner's certificates from all parties of interest included? <br /> Has the CSM been approved by all approving authorities like a plat? <br /> Is it monumented the same as a plat with bigger monuments at corners? <br /> Nn Has there been an adjacent CSM recorded with 4 parcels of 1 '/2 acres each or less within a period of 5 years? <br /> 236.02 (12) <br /> 140 Is the parcel in MFL? <br /> NO Does CSM change or cross school or other taxing districts? <br /> ,, Parcel Identification Number(s): iq 14 j i q 11 <br /> X Lot Number with improvements— LaF 1 — ALL <br /> Treasurer Review—(Let Surveyor know about delinquency) �� <br /> t//Treasurer Check for Taxes owed 80 2, J /L /9/Y0 V- /9/ 7/ _Ael-r.-e- <br /> -i,V4114,;-.41. ,240.c",)A ±1//f-42— Vii-e.Lii- . -7,61--71- ci-i<_g____ <br /> ,6< yz 0V31/a 3 , -- 1, 194.2D, <br /> SIGNATURE OF REVIEWER: DATE: <br /> /%0&2*Z <br /> \production\SURVEY\MISC ITEMS\Review Docs\CSM checksheet May_2018 <br />