Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> Surveyor checks these after GIS review <br /> ✓Math check each lot and add all parts to be sure totals are correct. <br /> Vfoes the proposed CSM fit with the parcel map,if available? <br /> Are all structures,bodies of water,wetlands,slopes over 20%, floodplain areas, recorded easements and covenants <br /> on the site and adjoiners shown?BC Ord. 58-52(b) <br /> g/tt Does the CSM cross a section line,40 line or Gov't Lot line?If so, make sure the corresponding data is shown. <br /> RPL Review—Surveyor/Zoning looks into any issues <br /> X Reconciles with Real Property Listing—Comments <br /> Np Does this CSM cross the exterior boundary of a recorded plat?236.34(1) <br /> Are additional parcels being created? <br /> Are owner's certificates from all parties of interest included? <br /> Has the CSM been approved by all approving authorities like a plat? <br /> Is it monumented the same as a plat with bigger monuments at corners? <br /> Nip Has there been an adjacent CSM recorded with 4 parcels of 1 %2 acres each or less within a period of 5 years? <br /> 236.02(12) <br /> go Is the parcel in MFL? <br /> hip Does CSM change or cross school or other taxing districts? <br /> •A Parcel Identification Number(s): '7mq. 7001 70002 7003 <br /> )C Lot Number with improvements— Lot 1 <br /> Treasurer Review—(Let Surveyor know about delinquency) <br /> /Treasurer Check for Taxes owed Q Q.c� �a/,�- /l ' 4 i i ZQ S <br /> 7 00t 700/, 7oo a 70o3 , 956- <br /> SIGNATURE OF REVIEWER: DATE: /2 /1 ZZ <br /> \production\SURVEY\MISC ITEMS\Review Docs\CSM checksheet May_2018 <br />