Laserfiche WebLink
Surveyor checks these after GIS review <br /> //M-ath check each lot and add all parts to be sure totals are correct. <br /> v Doe he proposed CSM fit with the parcel map, if available? <br /> Are all structures,bodies of water, wetlands, slopes over 20%, floodplain areas, recorded easements and covenants <br /> on the site and adjoiners shown?BC Ord. 58-52 (b) <br /> A/ Does the CSM cross a section line, 40 line or Gov't Lot line?If so, make sure the corresponding data is shown. <br /> RPL Review-Surveyor/Zoning looks into any issues <br /> Reconciles with Real Property Listing-Comments <br /> NDoes this CSM cross the exterior boundary of a recorded plat?236.34(1) <br /> Are additional parcels being created? <br /> Are owner's certificates from all parties of interest included? <br /> Has the CSM been approved by all approving authorities like a plat? <br /> Is it monumented the same as a plat with bigger monuments at corners? <br /> N Has there been an adjacent CSM recorded with 4 parcels of 1 'h acres each or less within a period of 5 years? <br /> 236.02 (12) <br /> N Is the parcel in MFL? <br /> Does CSM change or cross school or other taxing districts? <br /> Parcel Identification Number(s): ba(o81 (o)."la 6 -OI <br /> Lot Number with improvements- ( 15 <br /> Treasurer Review-(Let Surveyor know about delinquency) <br /> " Treasurer Check for Taxes owed;iAX, ID lip 7 lOCI, '4- U 21_191, -- 2v \ i 1.\JVc.c\� °L_.° 1-I?)1 I Z3 <br /> ---4Jo n i.Pax \Ni c r;2= ? - ‘c <br /> SIGNATURE OF REVIEWER: DATE: // e49Z� <br /> \production\SURVEY\MISC ITEMS\Review Docs\CSM checksheet May_2018 <br />