Laserfiche WebLink
v <br /> Surveyor checks these after GIS review <br /> M check each lot and add all parts to be sure totals are correct. <br /> D the proposed CSM fit with the parcel map, if available? <br /> Are all structures,bodies of water,wetlands, slopes over 20%, floodplain areas,recorded easements and covenants <br /> ,.n the site and adjoiners shown?BC Ord. 58-52(b) <br /> I Does the CSM cross a section line,40 line or Gov't Lot line?If so,make sure the corresponding data is shown. <br /> RPL Review—Surveyor/Zoning looks into any issues <br /> Y. Reconciles with Real Property Listing—Comments <br /> NDoes this CSM cross the exterior boundary of a recorded plat?236.34(1) <br /> Are additional parcels being created? <br /> Are owner's certificates from all parties of interest included? <br /> Has the CSM been approved by all approving authorities like a plat? <br /> Is it monumented the same as a plat with bigger monuments at corners? <br /> N Has there been an adjacent CSM recorded with 4 parcels of 1 %z acres each or less within a period of 5 years? <br /> 236.02 (12) <br /> N Is the parcel in MFL? <br /> tJDoes CSM change or cross school or other taxing districts? <br /> Parcel Identification Number(s): 1'2-3 0 9 <br /> Lot Number with improvements— L}-{ci <br /> Treasurer Review—(Let Surveyor know about delinquency) <br /> V Treasurer Check for Taxes owed & Q 5 2`2LI c 's c1 ? c27 k r.:, k t�` .:,N 4 TL: <br /> 1 <br /> SIGNATURE OF REVIEWER: DATE: . /.-- Z� <br /> \production\SURVEY\MISC ITEMS\Review Docs\CSM checksheet May_2018 <br />