Laserfiche WebLink
/' Surveyor checks these after GIS review <br /> L ath check each lot and add all parts to be sure totals are correct. <br /> Do s the proposed CSM fit with the parcel map, if available? <br /> Are all structures,bodies of water, wetlands, slopes over 20%, floodplain areas,recorded easements and covenants <br /> o} he site and adjoiners shown?BC Ord. 58-52 (b) <br /> Does the CSM cross a section line, 40 line or Gov't Lot line?If so, make sure the corresponding data is shown. <br /> RPL Review—Surveyor/Zoning looks into any issues <br /> '1 Reconciles with Real Property Listing—Comments <br /> N Does this CSM cross the exterior boundary of a recorded plat?236.34(1) <br /> Are additional parcels being created? <br /> Are owner's certificates from all parties of interest included? <br /> Has the CSM been approved by all approving authorities like a plat? <br /> Is it monumented the same as a plat with bigger monuments at corners? <br /> Has there been an adjacent CSM recorded with 4 parcels of 1 '/ acres each or less within a period of 5 years? <br /> 236.02 (12) <br /> N Is the parcel in MFL? <br /> N Does CSM change or cross school or other taxing districts? <br /> , Parcel Identification Number(s): 15(-)`ii{a.- 1G,-(L s <br /> x Lot Number with improvements— Lcy (p <br /> Treasurer Review—(Let Surveyor know about delinquency) <br /> v Treasurer Check for Taxes owed -CA v ^},fZ eth a,/D3. <br /> ,//f/ze 2-3 <br /> SIGNATURE OF REVIEWER: DATE: <br /> \production\SURVEY\MISC ITEMS\Review Docs\CSM checksheet May_2018 <br />