Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> P ! Surveyor checks these after GIS review <br /> Math check each lot and add all parts to be sure totals are correct. 44` " • • <br /> koes the proposed CSM fit with the parcel map, if available? <br /> all structures,bodies of water,wetlands,slopes over 20%, floodplain areas,recorded easements and covenants <br /> ,g n the site and adjoiners shown?BC Ord. 58-52(b) <br /> 7/" Mboes the CSM cross a section line,40 line or Gov't Lot line?If so,make sure the corresponding data is shown. <br /> RPL Review—Surveyor/Zoning looks into any issues <br /> ' Reconciles with Real Property Listing—Comments <br /> NDoes this CSM cross the exterior boundary of a recorded plat?236.34(1) <br /> Are additional parcels being created? <br /> Are owner's certificates from all parties of interest included? <br /> Has the CSM been approved by all approving authorities like a plat? <br /> Is it monumented the same as a plat with bigger monuments at corners? <br /> NHas there been an adjacent CSM recorded with 4 parcels of 1 1/2 acres each or less within a period of 5 years? <br /> 236.02(12) <br /> N Is the parcel in MFL? <br /> N Does CSM change or cross school or other taxing districts? <br /> x Parcel Identification Number(s): t a6�a. <br /> x Lot Number with improvements— Lab a. <br /> Treasurer Review—(Let Surveyor know about delinquency) <br /> Treasurer Check for Taxes owed�'�T ,\_ A t O%I M i ) <br /> SIGNATURE OF REVIEWER: DATE: 7//7 /g17 <br /> \production\SURVEY\MISC ITEMS\Review Docs\CSM checksheet May_2018 <br />