Laserfiche WebLink
Surveyor checks these after GIS review <br /> z thcheck each lot and add all parts to be sure totals are correct. <br /> AreDthe proposed CSM fit with the parcel map, if available? <br /> all structures,bodies of water,wetlands,slopes over 20%, floodplain areas, recorded easements and covenants <br /> on the site and adjoiners shown?BC Ord. 58-52 (b) <br /> ,/1Does the CSM cross a section line,40 line or Gov't Lot line?If so,make sure the corresponding data is shown. <br /> RPL Review—Surveyor/Zoning looks into any issues <br /> YReconciles with Real Property Listing—Comments <br /> N Does this CSM cross the exterior boundary of a recorded plat?236.34(1) <br /> Are additional parcels being created? <br /> Are owner's certificates from all parties of interest included? <br /> Has the CSM been approved by all approving authorities like a plat? <br /> Is it monumented the same as a plat with bigger monuments at corners? <br /> N Has there been an adjacent CSM recorded with 4 parcels of 1 %acres each or less within a period of 5 years? <br /> 236.02(12) <br /> NI Is the parcel in MFL? <br /> N Does CSM change or cross school or other taxing districts? <br /> x Parcel Identification Number(s): 36 a2(p 1 a- 3(na 4,3 <br /> x Lot Number with improvements— Lod 1 a a cc- kok 1 I fi- (.7._ c di(15 p-r\.- <br /> ; . Dr-.) <br /> Treasurer Review—(Let Surveyor know about delinquency) <br /> Treasurer Check for Taxes owed ciI, cks_ki2Jr`k ,c_ AL...ks \a1‘g1233 <br /> SIGNATURE OF REVIEWER: �— DATE: / Z7 20 ? <br /> \production\SURVEP\MISC ITEMS\Review Docs\CSM checksheet May_2018 <br />