Laserfiche WebLink
I\ - DECISION OF ZONING BOARD OF <br /> [APPEALS][ADJ U9I'MEN"T]. <br /> BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT <br /> 1 BURNETT COUNTY, WISCONSIN <br /> Case No. 443 <br /> Filing Date: 8/19/92 <br /> Notice Dates: 8/26 & 9/2/92 <br /> Hearing Date: 9/14/92 <br /> FINDINGS OF FACT <br /> Having heard the testimony and considered the evidence presented, the Board finds the followings facts: <br /> 1. The applicant or appellant is <br /> William Puchner <br /> (provide name and address) 98141 t Inihnson 1k. Rd <br /> Webster WI 54893 <br /> 2. The applicant or appellant is the ]owner][lessee][morigagee] of the following described properly which is the <br /> subject of the application or appeal: _ % of_%, Town of Oakland Burnett County known as <br /> (street address) Pc ovoE—�7,—soc <br /> Same as above <br /> 3 The property is presently in use for Res./Ree. and has been so used continuously since <br /> 4. The applicant or appellant proposes (brief project description/auach plans): <br /> To increase the fair market value of a nonconforming dwelling greater than 50% and <br /> also to construct an addition at less than 2 feet above the regional flood with less <br /> than 15 feet of fill around the addition. <br /> 5. The applicant or appellant requests: <br /> a. An appeal of the zoning administrator's determination. <br /> b. A conditional use permit. <br /> c. X A variance. <br /> 10.1(of the 4.ancc( ) ofthe Floodplain Ordinance <br /> Under Section _ (attached). <br /> 6. The features of the proposed construction and property which relate to the grant or denial of the application or <br /> appeal are (refer to the standards or criteria in the ordinance): The proposed addiLinn will oat as _ <br /> the current fair market value to have increased beyond 50% over the life of the <br /> structure. <br /> The proposed addition will not be at or above the regional flood protection elevation. <br /> _l _ <br />