Laserfiche WebLink
Surveyor checks these after GIS review <br /> Vath check each lot and add all parts to be sure totals are correct. <br /> p es the proposed CSM fit with the parcel map, if available? <br /> V Are all structures,bodies of water,wetlands,slopes over 20%, floodplain areas,recorded easements and covenants <br /> site and adjoiners shown?BC Ord. 58-52(b) <br /> the CSM cross a section line,40 line or Gov't Lot line?If so,make sure the corresponding data is shown. <br /> 7 <br /> RPL Review—Surveyor/Zoning looks into any issues <br /> 1 Reconciles with Real Property Listing—Comments <br /> Ni Does this CSM cross the exterior boundary of a recorded plat?236.34(1) <br /> Are additional parcels being created? <br /> Are owner's certificates from all parties of interest included? <br /> Has the CSM been approved by all approving authorities like a plat? <br /> Is it monumented the same as a plat with bigger monuments at corners? <br /> 0 Has there been an adjacent CSM recorded with 4 parcels of 1 'h acres each or less within a period of 5 years? <br /> 236.02(12) <br /> ti Is the parcel in MFL? <br /> N Does CSM change or cross school or other taxing districts? <br /> X Parcel Identification Number(s): an 33 a$$ 3 2 3 y(o, a 68`t 5, aggLI -7 <br /> X Lot Number with improvements— LbV I , Lod 4 <br /> Treasurer Review—(Let Surveyor know about delinquency) <br /> Treasurer Check for Taxes owed <br /> SIGNATURE OF REVIEWER: DATE: /6 0e2S <br /> os f► 'I/ . - Pe"A°"-c N- i11 t,to 4_ 1..0(:).:2,7 <br /> 11oa '� P � ' C�!/' _CY <br /> o � $ <br /> (0,51/- we__S "(-- (1' <br /> a -ems 74- fr-714-) 76 '/-4 e44 <br /> ,-/- -Hig/- -7r <br /> t/v1 e-- ai VI)q ci 1,05 W ' L/ be v\ccltifferNez7/ Q/oey <br /> A74sz ,(,t, <br /> \production\SU V Y\MISC rrE iew D cs\CSM checks eet May 2 <br /> I1 I r,DQt 07a e <br /> itii IA, <br /> p to.cezi Yi Li/ 4 e Ito tke l A f,„ “e. 0 91/.71.:' <br />