Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> Surveyor checks these after GIS review <br /> !/Math check each lot and add all parts to be sure totals are correct. <br /> f/D s the proposed CSM fit with the parcel map, if available? <br /> Are all structures,bodies of water,wetlands,slopes over 20%, floodplain areas,recorded easements and covenants <br /> on the site and adjoiners shown?BC Ord. 58-52(b) <br /> /iDoes the CSM cross a section line,40 line or Gov't Lot line?If so,make sure the corresponding data is shown. <br /> RPL Review—Surveyor/Zoning looks into any issues <br /> Reconciles with Real Property Listing—Comments <br /> Does this CSM cross the exterior boundary of a recorded plat?236.34(1) <br /> Are additional parcels being created? <br /> Are owner's certificates from all parties of interest included? <br /> Has the CSM been approved by all approving authorities like a plat? <br /> n Is it monumented the same as a plat with bigger monuments at corners? <br /> IN Has there been an adjacent CSM recorded with 4 parcels of 1 '/2 acres each or less within a period of 5 years? <br /> 236.02(12) <br /> Iv Is the parcel in MFL? <br /> Does CSM change or cross school or other taxing districts? <br /> Parcel Identification Number(s): t) 314161 °+' 3 <br /> JLot Number with improvements— W-/- <br /> Treasurer Review—(Let Surveyor know about delinquency) <br /> k, Treasurer Check for Taxes owed \aws pa %A £4J oFJI,; <br /> SIGNATURE OF REVIEWER: DATE: /4/0402-5---- <br /> \production\SURVEY\MISC ITEMS\Review Docs\CSM checksheet May_2018 <br />