Laserfiche WebLink
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW <br /> Based on the above findings of fact the Board concludes that: <br /> INTERPRETATION - The zoning administrator's interpretation of Section of the zoning code [is/is not] a <br /> correct interpretation because: <br /> APPEAL. - The order of the zoning administrator [is]lis not] in excess of [his]Vier] authority because: <br /> VARIANCE - The variance must meet all three of the following tests: <br /> A. Unnecessary hardship [is]PM] present in that a literal enforcement of the terms of the zoning ordinance <br /> would JVb dSf)(tYJ deny the applicant all reasonable use of the property because: <br /> Building limitations an property <br /> B. The hardship [fs]p)MM due to physical limitations of the property rather than the circumstances of the <br /> appellant because: <br /> Topography at building setbacks and existing location of adjoining structures <br /> C. The variance will not be contrary to the public interest as expressed by the objectives of the ordinance <br /> because:.. <br /> Building location of adjoining structures are as close or closer than proposed <br /> location <br /> CONDITIONAL USE - The application for a conditional use permit [does][does not] qualify under the criteria of <br /> Section of the ordinance because: <br /> - 2 - <br />