Laserfiche WebLink
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW <br /> Based on the above findings of fact the Board concludes that: <br /> INTERPRETATION - The zoning administrator's interpretation of Section of the zoning code [is/is not] a <br /> correct interpretation because: <br /> APPEAL - The order of the zoning administrator [is][is not] in excess of [his][her]_authority because: <br /> VARIANCE - The variance must meet all three of the following tests: <br /> A. Unnecessary hardship [is][is not] present in that a literal enforcement of the terms of the zoning ordinance <br /> [would][would not] deny the applicant all reasonable use of the property because: <br /> N/A: Use or special exception variance. <br /> B. The hardship [is][is not] due to physical limitations of the property rather than the circumstances of the <br /> appellant because: <br /> N/A: Use or special exception variance. <br /> C. The variance pWRI[will not be contrary to the public interest as expressed by the objectives of the ordinance <br /> Th <br /> because: ep ns quest house will not be able to be subdivided It will <br /> be dependent on the main home, as it is part garage and behind the private street. <br /> CONDITIONAL USE - The application for a conditional use permit [does][does not] qualify under the criteria of <br /> Section of the ordinance because: <br /> - 2 - <br />