2017/03/22 - OTHER - (NA) - Note (82)

Home Browse Search

Edward Joseph Cycenas, patent assign Non-Domestic, C/o: 7507 Woodland Estates Road Siren [54872], Wisconsin To: James Flanigan 23889 151 Ave., Siren, WI 54872 To: BURNETT COUNTY 7410 COUNTY ROAD K, #102 SIREN, WI 54872 Dear Sirs; I have been forwarded a copy of a letter by Jim(James) Flanigan asserting to Spencer Cobb that my patent-land and patent-rights are again being made subject to a BURNETT COUNTY Ordinance thus being trespassed/infringed thereby. This time is would appear that you mean to apply the internal BURNETT COUNTY Subdivision Ordinances to my private- property/patent-land which lies "without"BURNETT COUNTY. Your actions thus deprives me of my right to exclude you and your"regulations"from my private-property and constitute a constructive entry/trespass/infringement/taking (HEREINAFTER: Infringement). The fee for Infringement should by this time be well known to you through Notice served upon you, notice posted on the land, Public Notice published in the Paper of Record, federal suit, and through billings presented to you and as yet remaining unpaid,unabated and adding-up. It would now appear that your multiple actions under color of law are knowing, willful, intentional and by continuance malicious. You have foreclosed your opportunity to apologize for your last activity and I see no reason why criminal prosecutions should not be pressed against each and everyone involved under one or more of the following federal statutes: 18 U.S.C. 242 (deprivation of rights under color of law), 18 U.S.C. 241 (conspiracy to deprive rights), 18 U.S.C. 666(a)(1)(A) (Theft/fraud/etc. in government), 18 U.S.C. 1341 (Mail Fraud), 18 U.S.C. 1961 (R.I.C.O.). For the last time, My patent land is not subject to your internal regulations and any land I own an interest in is protected by patent from your infringement. Consider this my Notice of Intent to Sue on this subsequent act of infringement. You still have not fired James Flanigan and the others, so BURNETT COUNTY and it's Board Members must be admitting that they are respondent superior and co-conspirators in James Flaingan's initial acts of flagrant taking under color of law and even more so in his subsequent acts. I venture to guess that even the most generous of insurance companies will not cover a subsequent act,materially similar, as an "error" or"omission". Until each and every Infringer obtains a written permit or is fired, BURNETT COUNTY and all Board Members who haven't quit will continue to incur additional fee/fines and I can see no reason why some or all wouldn't face criminal charges.