Laserfiche WebLink
1= <br /> CONCLUSIONS OF LAW <br /> THE VARIANCE MUST MEET ALL THREE OF THE FOLLOWING TESTS: <br /> A. UNNECESSARY HARDSHIP IS PRESENT IN THAT A LITERAL ENFORCEMENT OF THE TERMS OF THE <br /> ZONING ORDINANCE WOULD UNREASONABLY PREVENT OWNER FROM USING THE PROPERTY FOR A <br /> PERMITTED USE BECAUSE: <br /> NO AREA EXISTS ON THE PARCEL WHICH WOULD ALLOW THE GARAGE TO BE <br /> CONSTRUCTED <br /> B. THE HARDSHIP IS DUE TO PHYSICAL LIMITATIONS OF THE PROPERTY RATHER THAN THE <br /> CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE APPELLANT BECAUSE: <br /> GRANDFATHERED LOT PREVENTS MEETING SETBACK TO LAKE AND ROAD WITH <br /> CABIN, WELL AND SEPTIC SYTEM <br /> C. THE VARIANCE WILL NOT BE CONTRARY TO THE PUBLIC INTEREST AS EXPRESSED BY THE <br /> OBJECTIVES OF THE ORDINANCE BECAUSE: <br /> GARAGE DOORS WILL NOT BE TOWARDS ROAD AND WILL NOT PREVENT ROAD <br /> MAINTENANCE <br />