Laserfiche WebLink
�fa private road is proposed make sure"Road"isn't used in the name.Use Lane,Drive,Path,Trail, <br /> 9 Way, Circle,etc.to signify a private road. <br /> /I/ If a private road is proposed,has the private road sign fee been paid? <br /> Surveyor checks these after GIS review <br /> Ma heck each lot and add all parts to be sure totals are correct. <br /> the proposed CSM fit with the parcel map, if available? <br /> // Are all structures,bodies of water, wetlands, slopes over 20%, floodplain areas,recorded easements <br /> venants on the site and adjoiners shown?BC Ord. 58-52(b) <br /> Does the CSM cross a section line,40 line or Gov't Lot line?If so,make sure the corresponding data <br /> is shown. ' ) <br /> RPL Review—Surveyor looks into any issues <br /> ✓Reconciles with Real Property Listing—Comments 5 <br /> N Does this CSM cross the exterior boundary of a recorded plat?236.34(1) <br /> Are additional parcels being created? <br /> Areowner's certificates from all parties of interest included? <br /> Has the CSM been approved by all approving authorities like a plat? <br /> Is it monumented the same as a plat with bigger monuments at corners? <br /> N Has there been an adjacent CSM recorded with 4 parcels of 1 '/2 acres each or less within a period of <br /> 5 years? 236.02(12) <br /> i\/,Is the parcel in MFL? <br /> Parcel <br /> CSM change or cross school or other taxing districts? <br /> Parcel Identification Number is <br /> V`-Lot Number with improvements—Comments <br /> Treasurer Review—(Let Surveyor know about delinquency) <br /> Treasurer Ch for Taxes owed <br /> 01.E ►� s5 l--Z ,5 tQ74 <br /> SIGNATURE OF REVIEWER: DATE: <br /> \production\SURVEY M[SC rrEMS\Review Docs\CSM checksheet 12-22-2014 �i �� <br />