Laserfiche WebLink
FEE: $200 VARIANCE APPEAL# �U� ZONING <br /> 10 [IN <br /> JJ <br /> PETITION FOR SUBDIVISION VARIANCE <br /> Burnett County Zoning Committee <br /> 7410 County Road K,#102 Siren, Wisconsin 54872 Phone(715) 349-2138 <br /> Property Owner's Name—Greg Phillips,August Phillips <br /> Applicant's Name_Phil Richard <br /> Mailing Address/Telephone W 5011 Aspen Lane, Park Falls, WI 54552, 715 762 1352(day), <br /> 715 762 2838(eve) <br /> Legal Description_Parcel numbers-24-3124-03-505, 24-3124-04-210, 24-3124-03-900, 24-3124-03- <br /> 600. Please see the attached legal descriptions. <br /> Fire# NA Road Name Bass Lake Lane <br /> Variance Requested_To combine 24-3124-03-505 with 24-3124-04-210 and a portion Qf 24-3124-03- <br /> 6M This would be one lot. ,02-3124-03-900 would be added to the remainder of 24-3124--03-600 to be <br /> another lot. This would create two buildable lots instead of the three existing buildable lots, which meet <br /> current land use and zoning requirements. The 24-3124-03-600 lot would have a minimum of 300 feet of <br /> lake frontage and would be a minimum of five acres in size. <br /> Address each of the following criteria for granting a variance: <br /> 1. Unnecessary hardship is present because... _The desire to reduce the potential for greater housing <br /> density and development on a class III lake is blocked by an out dated,non-used outlot from a <br /> 1984 plat. Based on a review by George Benson, Benson Law Office, and Burnett County <br /> Abstract Company, no one has access rights to the outlot(24-3124-03-505). This would be <br /> compatible with no one attempting to access the outlot. Please see the attached letters from <br /> George Benson and Burnett County Abstract Company in regards to the outiot. <br /> 2. Unique features of this property prevent compliance with the terms of the ordinance; they <br /> include... _The presence of an outlot precludes the creation of a larger lake lot and reduction to <br /> two buildable lots instead of three. Please see the attached letters from George Benson and <br /> Burnett County Abstract Company. <br /> 3. A variance will not be contrary to the public interest because..._It is more in tune with the spirit <br /> of the ordinance in that it will reduce the density on a class III lake and more closely complies <br /> with the Burnett County Development Standards. This would also allow for future development <br /> to be more evenly spaced and at a lower density than what could be developed <br /> currently. <br />