My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017/03/22 - OTHER - (NA) - Note (89)
Burnett-County
>
Property Files
>
TOWN OF DANIELS
>
2129
>
2017/03/22 - OTHER - (NA) - Note (89)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2020 6:17:16 PM
Creation date
9/28/2017 6:08:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Property Files v2
Document Date
3/22/2017
Document Type 1
OTHER
Document Type 2
(NA)
Document Type 3
Note
Tax ID
2129
Pin Number
07-006-2-38-17-15-2 04-000-011000
Legacy Pin
006241503200
Municipality
TOWN OF DANIELS
Owner Name
EDWARD JOSEPH MINISTRIES INC
Property Address
23871 TOLLANDER RD
City
SIREN
State
WI
Zip
54872
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Edward Joseph Cycenas,Patent Assign <br /> Non-Domestic,C/o: <br /> 7507 Woodland Estates Road <br /> Siren[54872],Wisconsin <br /> October 13,2003 <br /> To: Jim(James) Flanigan,and BURNETT COUNTY <br /> 7410 County Road K,#102 <br /> SIREN,WI 54872 <br /> Re: letter Dated September 200 ,2003 (copy attached). <br /> Mr.Jim (James)Flanigan,and BURNETT COUNTY,Inc. <br /> It has come to my attention that you persist in imposing unlawful restrictions on my <br /> patent lands even after receiving Notice. In your letter dated September 2601, 2003 you begin with <br /> an assumption that"County/State Sanitary Codes do apply". This is both incorrect and injurious <br /> to me as a trespass/taking/infringement by your assertions under color of law. <br /> The Patents pertaining to these lands have long been of Public Notice by filing in the <br /> county records office. I suspect you can find the Register of Deeds down the hall from your <br /> office. These Patents are declarations by authorized Agents of Congress and signed into positive <br /> law by the president. As Law enacted,the patent, properly places these parcels(together with all <br /> rights and appurtenances)"without"BURNETT COUNTY and STATE OF WISCONSIN. This <br /> makes my land similar to the Indian Reservations upon which the State/County Sanitation Codes <br /> simply DO NOT APPLY. <br /> You should be aware that"even the sovereign states themselves do not have the power to <br /> overturn Land Patents and their effects on land,namely the severance from interference in them <br /> by the administration of government"(See: Gibson v Chouteau, 80 US(13 Wall.) 92 (1872)) <br /> You have received Notice,and Public Notice has been made by publication,of the <br /> fees/fines you incur by making assertions that deny or disparage the full and unfettered use of my <br /> lands. You(Jim)are also being sued in federal court for the last time you came against me and <br /> my land. You and your organization should know better than to commit a second offense of what <br /> I believe to be racketeering/influence. <br /> YOUR ASSERTION IS A TRESPASS CLOUDING MY RIGHTS/TITLE/INTEREST IN <br /> MY PATENT LAND,RECIND YOUR ASSERTION NOW OR YOU HAVE ADMITTED <br /> AND CONFESSED TRESPASS BY YOURSELF AND BURNETT COUNTY. <br /> 1 will allow you no access either real or constructive until all fees are paid up front and all <br /> accessing parties are in possession of written Permit(s). Since it would appear that you are <br /> requesting a Permit for your company,the Cost would be three million six hundred and fifty <br /> thousand($3,650,000.00)Dollars for each year you plan to make County/State Sanitary Codes <br /> applicable to the land referenced. You will also need one for: the County,the State,any signer, <br /> any inspector or participant of g ai "assessment"appertaining to the lands reference in the Notice. <br /> You should also be aware that failure to pay these fees in advance may subject you to suit <br /> for treble damages,costs, interest and penalties. And that"a state statute enacted subsequent to a <br /> federal grant cannot operate to vest in the State rights which either remained in the United States <br /> or passed to the grantee [or his heirs or assigns]" United States v. Oregon, 295 US 1,28(1935) <br /> And in the case of this Patent"all" rights passed. Since the State then has no right title or interest <br /> Private and Non-Negotiable <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.