Laserfiche WebLink
If a private road is proposed make sure "Road" isn't used in the name. Use Lane, Drive, Path, Trail, <br />Way, Circle, etc. to signify a private road. <br />_Vlf a private road is proposed, has the private road sign fee been paid? <br />/XASurveyor checks these after GIS review <br />ath check each lot and add all parts to be sure totals are correct. <br />� Do the propos CSM fit w' the parcel map, if available? <br />Are all structu" res, bodie of water, wetlands, slopes over 20%, floodplain areas, recorded easements <br />d covenants on the site and adjoiners shown? BC Ord. 58-52 (b) <br />Does the CSM cross a section line, 40 line or Gov't Lot line? If so, make sure the corresponding data <br />is shown. <br />RPL Review — Surveyor looks into any issues <br />Reconciles with Real Property Listing — Comments <br />_Does this CSM cross the exterior boundary of a recorded plat? 236.34 (1) <br />Are additional parcels being created? <br />TAre owner's certificates from all parties of interest included? <br />—THas the CSM been approved by all approving authorities like a plat? <br />hii Is it monumented the same as a plat with bigger monuments at corners? <br />N Has there been an adjacent CSM recorded with 4 parcels of 1 <br />5 years? 236.02 (12) <br />Y—Is the parcel in MFL? <br />Does CSM change or cross school or other taxing districts? <br />P"'p-arcel Identification Number is `' 6 <br />t"Lot Number with improvements — Comments <br />'/2 acres each or less within a period of <br />Treasurer Review — (Let Surveyor know about delinquency) <br />✓ Treasurer Check for Taxes owed, c,2410g'? y .6 -Lu - <br />11 <br />Ol/, / /17 <br />9111 - <br />SIGNATURE OF REVIEWER: DATE: <br />\production\SURVEYNISC ITEMS\Review Docs\CSM checksheet 12-22-2014 <br />.L(Z- <br />L<1 - <br />