Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2a + b of 8 <br />Individual Site Design and Plan Narrative <br />The objective of this individual site design is to create a sanitary system design that will serve a new four <br />bedroom replacement structure. The property is located at 27283 East Devils lake Rd. and is owned by <br />David and Laura Fitzpatrick. The legal description is: Lots 12 and 13 of the Colter's Subdivision located <br />in Gov. Lot 2, Sec. 34 T40N-R16W in the Township of Oakland in Burnett County. <br />The parcel is a .80 acre lakeshore lot with limited area to support a sanitary system due to soil conditions, <br />slope constraints and well, lake and structural setbacks. <br />Because fill material consisting of an existing 12 ft. x 42 ft. aggregate drain field was documented in the <br />soil profile borings, and a 2-3% cross slope over which the new dispersal area will be located I will be <br />unable to complete a sanitary design using the mound component manual recognized under SPS <br />383.60(l). <br />SPS 383.44(3) (b) 1 states that a POWTS designed utilizing a component manual recognized under <br />SPS383.60 (1) shall have at least 6" of the minimum 24 -inch soil separation required under par. (a) shall <br />be an insitu soil type for which soil treatment capability has been credited under Table 383.44-3. <br />These filled sites require plan approval to be applied for as an individual site design. Individual Site <br />Designs require documentation that will support treatment and dispersal claims about the site. Individual <br />Site Designs do not require the 6 inches of insitu soil, however we still need to evaluate and be confident <br />that the intent or rationale of the 6 inches of suitable soil is met on our site assuring that the influent will <br />be assimilated into the subsurface soils and treated without ponding on the ground surface. <br />This individual site design as previously stated has two design parameters that deviate from the standard <br />component manual mound system design due to the limited area available for locating a replacement <br />sanitary system. The following are the specific deviations and a discussion on how we hope to achieve <br />code equivalency. <br />I will first discuss the soil conditions above the existing drain field. Boring #3 is an extension of B#2 <br />showing a sandy loam surface horizon with a moderate, medium sub -angular structure to a depth of 4 <br />inches. The 2"d horizon shows a mixing of subsoil materials consisting of moderate, medium structured <br />sandy loam, and single grained loamy fine sand and some well structured clay ped inclusions to a depth of <br />34 inches below grade. The next 6 inches of documented soil was a similar mix with redoximorphic <br />features. These features indicate that at some point in time the soils were saturated above the systems <br />aggregate surface. Digging deeper into the aggregate I found that it had been infiltrated by loamy fine <br />sand and fine to medium tree roots. The aggregate was basically clean and there was no visual evidence <br />of a clogging mat or saturated soil conditions. This would indicate that the cabin has seen no or little use <br />in the past few years. As the Fitzpatricks purchased this parcel in June of 2014 and currently have a <br />separate cabin they use to the north of this parcel. Note: as we move upslope the separation between the <br />aggregate and ground surface increases by approx. 7 inches. <br />The Burnett County zoning office found the sanitary permit # 574 for this site and an installation date of <br />1985. This date is important in that it would mean that 33 years worth of growing seasons have passed <br />including the freeze and thaw cycles to settle the fill and provide sufficient time to repair or create soil <br />structur By using a.4 gal./sq. ft. basal loading rate we will provide a sufficient area for the treated <br />wastewater to infiltrate the disturbed soils and provide a margin for our cross slope issue as well. <br />