Laserfiche WebLink
• IF <br />Surveyor checks these after GIS review <br />V'*'Math check each lot and add all parts to be sure totals are correct. <br />!/ lloes the proposed CSM fit with the parcel map, if available? <br />v-`Xie all structures, bodies of water, wetlands, slopes over 20%, floodplain areas, recorded easements and covenants <br />on t e site and adjoiners shown? BC Ord. 58-52 (b) <br />oes the CSM cross a section line, 40 line or Gov't Lot line? If so, make sure the corresponding data is shown. <br />RPL Review — Surveyor / Zoning looks into any issues <br />,/Reconciles with Real Property Listing — Comments <br />1' Does this CSM cross the exterior boundary of a recorded plat? 236.34 (1) <br />rA <br />e additional parcels being created? <br />e owner's certificates from all parties of interest included? <br />s the CSM been approved by all approving authorities like a plat? <br />Is it monumented the same as a plat with bigger monuments at corners? <br />Has there been an adjacent CSM recorded with 4 parcels of 1 '/2 acres each or less within a period of 5 years? <br />236.02 (12) <br />Is the parcel in MFL? <br />i' . Does CSM change or cross school or other taxing districts? <br />✓Parcel Identification Number(s): <br />\%Lot Number with improvements — Comments L 2y` <br />Treasurer Review — (Let Surveyor kno�"/:Zel� <br />binquency) <br />Treasurer Check for Taxes owed-,,,,2W Qx e <br />SIGNATUREOF REVIEWER: DATE: <br />\production\SURVEY\MISC ITEMS\Review Docs\CSM checksheet May_2018 <br />