Laserfiche WebLink
Surveyor checks these after GIS review <br /> /Math check each lot and add all parts to be sure totals are correct. <br /> Does the proposed CSM fit with the parcel map, if available? <br /> / Are all structures,bodies of water,wetlands, slopes over 20%, floodplain areas,recorded easements and covenants <br /> on the site and adjoiners shown?BC Ord. 58-52 (b) <br /> �oes the CSM cross a section line,40 line or Gov't Lot line?If so,make sure the corresponding data is shown. <br /> RPL Review—Surveyor/Zoning looks into any issues <br /> JReconciles with Real Property Listing—Comments <br /> 14. Does this CSM cross the exterior boundary of a recorded plat?236.34(1) <br /> - Are additional parcels being created? <br /> • Are owner's certificates from all parties of interest included? <br /> - Has the CSM been approved by all approving authorities like a plat? <br /> - Is it monumented the same as a plat with bigger monuments at corners? <br /> 4j Has there been an adjacent CSM recorded with 4 parcels of 1 1/2 acres each or less within a period of 5 years? <br /> 236.02 (12) <br /> No Is the parcel in MFL? <br /> No Does CSM change or cross school or other taxing districts? <br /> 4 Parcel Identification Number(s): Q1-0t4-Z-38-15-08-5 05-004-011000 <br /> J Lot Number with improvements—Comments t} 1 has improvement-s, Lot- "2_ is vacank ‘and. <br /> Treasurer Review—(Let Survey . ow about delinquency)�c <br /> Treasurer Check for Taxes owed /.i_ _� 4 14 iAVL. lc, <br /> 41; /fl4J6_ � a`Ge. `a.Cs 9/dc)/;)°ci <br /> - <br /> SIGNATURE OF REVIEWER:___) DATE: 107/7?-40 ' <br /> \production\SURVEY\MISC ITEMS\Review Docs\CSM checksheet May_2018 <br />