Laserfiche WebLink
04 <br /> Surveyor checks these after GIS review <br /> Math check each lot and add all parts to be sure totals are correct. <br /> toes the proposed CSM fit with the parcel map, if available? <br /> je all structures,bodies of water,wetlands, slopes over 20%, floodplain areas,recorded easements and covenants <br /> onsite and adjoiners shown?BC Ord. 58-52(b) <br /> frthe <br /> oes the CSM cross a section line,40 line or Gov't Lot line?If so,make sure the corresponding data is shown. <br /> RPL Review-Surveyor/Zoning looks into any issues <br /> X Reconciles with Real Property Listing-Comments -fax 10 limp <br /> No Does this CSM cross the exterior boundary of a recorded plat?236.34(1) <br /> - Are additional parcels being created? <br /> Are owner's certificates from all parties of interest included? <br /> - Has the CSM been approved by all approving authorities like a plat? <br /> - Is it monumented the same as a plat with bigger monuments at corners? <br /> We, Has there been an adjacent CSM recorded with 4 parcels of 1 %2 acres each or less within a period of 5 years? <br /> 236.02(12) <br /> Mo Is the parcel in MFL? <br /> Na Does CSM change or cross school or other taxing districts? <br /> x Parcel Identification Number(s): 09-Opp-Z- -11p-11-5 15-Z,1l-0 3QQ0 <br /> J Lot Number with improvements-Comments Loi- 13 appears to be. vaLarl4 ‘and reMaln6er <br /> nas improvements. <br /> Treasurer Review-(Let Survey r know about delinquency) <br /> V Treasurer Check for Taxes owed !� $ IO( /14' ICE <br /> 6 4/( _ 6///6e.- a:a.611.1- /o/�a/ ao <br /> i <br /> SIGNATURE OF REVIEWER: ' DATE: /&/Y3694°' <br /> f <br /> \production\SURVEY\MISC ITEMS\Review Docs\CSM checksheet May_2018 <br />