Laserfiche WebLink
Surveyor checks these after GIS review <br /> t/(4;t/(4; check each lot and add all parts to be sure totals are correct. <br /> jDo e proposed CSM fit with the parcel map, if available? <br /> Are all structures,bodies of water,wetlands, slopes over 20%, floodplain areas,recorded easements and covenants <br /> on the site and adjoiners shown?BC Ord. 58-52(b) <br /> /J/'Does the CSM cross a section line, 40 line or Gov't Lot line?If so,make sure the corresponding data is shown. <br /> RPL Review—Surveyor/Zoning looks into any issues <br /> iReconciles with Real Property Listing—Comments Tex ip 3f7 5 <br /> No Does this CSM cross the exterior boundary of a recorded plat?236.34(1) <br /> - Are additional parcels being created? <br /> - Are owner's certificates from all parties of interest included? <br /> - Has the CSM been approved by all approving authorities like a plat? <br /> - Is it monumented the same as a plat with bigger monuments at corners? <br /> go Has there been an adjacent CSM recorded with 4 parcels of 1 '/Z acres each or less within a period of 5 years? <br /> 236.02 (12) <br /> yEs Is the parcel in MFL? MFL QPn <br /> 'Jo Does CSM change or cross school or other taxing districts? <br /> 4 Parcel Identification Number(s):on-on-2_-38-1a-CA-\ O2.-01O0-am() <br /> mO <br /> J Lot Number with improvements—Comments all lis are vacan+ \and <br /> Treasurer Review—(Let Surveyor kno,about delinquency) <br /> Treasurer Check for Taxes owed /,, ' a i/ 1 , <br /> f <br /> Ab Way. — /Ce., GIGc,b;Sf 11131a6Q, <br /> SIGNATURE OF REVIEWER: 0 ATE: /! lO 7A?.4°' <br /> \production\SURVEY\MISC ITEMS\Review Docs\CSM checksheet May_2018 <br />