Laserfiche WebLink
Surveyor checks these after GIS review <br /> at./ heck each lot and add all parts to be sure totals are correct. <br /> oes the proposed CSM fit with the parcel map, if available? <br /> all structures,bodies of water,wetlands, slopes over 20%, floodplain areas,recorded easements and covenants <br /> on the site and adjoiners shown?BC Ord. 58-52(b) <br /> i(///5oes the CSM cross a section line,40 line or Gov't Lot line?If so,make sure the corresponding data is shown. <br /> RPL Review—Surveyor/Zoning looks into any issues <br /> X Reconciles with Real Property Listing—Comments Tax Ins 3ggr1 * assb <br /> No Does this CSM cross the exterior boundary of a recorded plat?236.34(1) <br /> - Are additional parcels being created? <br /> - Are owner's certificates from all parties of interest included? <br /> - Has the CSM been approved by all approving authorities like a plat? <br /> - Is it monumented the same as a plat with bigger monuments at corners? <br /> No Has there been an adjacent CSM recorded with 4 parcels of 1 %2 acres each or less within a period of 5 years? <br /> 236.02 (12) <br /> poo Is the parcel in MFL? <br /> No Does CSM change or cross school or other taxing districts? <br /> J Parcel Identification Number(s): cri-O10-2.-38- 19-09-3 04-000'0\1000 <br /> O'1-On-2_-38-19-09-3- o4-000-cam() <br /> \I Lot Number with improvements—Comments t„04- 1 contains impreottnents <br /> Treasurer Review—(Let Sury or know about delinquency)in <br /> Treasurer Check for Taxes owed �Cc�Ck.S I d 1✓. -ai <br /> 3/eQ..1 tQ {(Si- I 1/3/_ o <br /> SIGNATURE OF REVIEWER: ' DATE: 0/0-0 ZO <br /> \production\SURVEY\MISC ITEMS\Review Docs\CSM checksheet May_2018 <br />