Laserfiche WebLink
Surveyor checks these after GIS review <br /> 7- th check each lot and add all parts to be sure totals are correct. <br /> D s the proposed CSM fit with the parcel map, if available? <br /> Are all structures,bodies of water,wetlands, slopes over 20%, floodplain areas,recorded easements and covenants <br /> on the site and adjoiners shown?BC Ord. 58-52 (b) <br /> fiDoes the CSM cross a section line,40 line or Gov't Lot line?If so,make sure the corresponding data is shown. <br /> RPL Review—Surveyor/Zoning looks into any issues <br /> ,/ Reconciles with Real Property Listing—Comments 'hex 1D 321r1aQ <br /> 1 Does this CSM cross the exterior boundary of a recorded plat?236.34(1) <br /> 1,1„ Are additional parcels being created? <br /> N„ Are owner's certificates from all parties of interest included? <br /> - Has the CSM been approved by all approving authorities like a plat? <br /> - Is it monumented the same as a plat with bigger monuments at corners? <br /> j, _Has there been an adjacent CSM recorded with 4 parcels of 1 '/z acres each or less within a period of 5 years? <br /> 236.02 (12) <br /> t4 Is the parcel in MFL? <br /> No Does CSM change or cross school or other taxing districts? <br /> J Parcel Identification Number(s): iy 1-04Z-2-3A-18-84-5 05-004-011001 <br /> 4 Lot Number with improvements—Comments 50-41 Icks will coni.alr' irr ro e:men-iS <br /> Treasurer Review—(Let Surveyor low about delinquency) <br /> /Pr' LL /_ <br /> reasurer Check for Taxes owed . ,A0t // / t _ <br /> 4 <br /> ///3'. /r.)e,; )44,47_ y,./„........ <br /> .,_.)„,,,-s../.._ <br /> SIGNATURE OF REVIEWER: i °`-'—'-------- ///7/2497-6'DATE: <br /> \production\SURVEY\MISC ITEMS\Review Docs\CSM checksheet May_2018 <br />