Laserfiche WebLink
/� Surveyor checks these after GIS review <br /> f/dt <br /> h check each lot and add all parts to be sure totals are correct. <br /> ,/mss the proposed CSM fit with the parcel map, if available? <br /> Are all structures,bodies of water,wetlands, slopes over 20%, floodplain areas,recorded easements and covenants <br /> asite and adjoiners shown?BC Ord. 58-52(b) <br /> es the CSM cross a section line,40 line or Gov't Lot line?If so,make sure the corresponding data is shown. <br /> RPL Review—Surveyor/Zoning looks into any issues <br /> f Reconciles with Real Property Listing—Comments tU's 2111(o, 2.'711'i, 2,: \ 9 <br /> Ne Does this CSM cross the exterior boundary of a recorded plat?236.34(1) <br /> - Are additional parcels being created? <br /> Are owner's certificates from all parties of interest included? <br /> Has the CSM been approved by all approving authorities like a plat? <br /> • Is it monumented the same as a plat with bigger monuments at corners? <br /> Ne Has there been an adjacent CSM recorded with 4 parcels of 1 'h acres each or less within a period of 5 years? <br /> 236.02 (12) <br /> No Is the parcel in MFL? <br /> N„ Does CSM change or cross school or other taxing districts? <br /> J Parcel Identification Number(s): ori-o38-2--4t-14-3O-5 15-tOt-033= <br /> O'7-o8-2.-4I -t4 -3o-5 t5- 101 - 0340x0 <br /> O1-038-2-41- 14--30-S 15-tOt- 035000 <br /> 4 Lot Number with improvements—Comments vg {- 1 <br /> Treasurer Review—(Let Surveyor know about delinquency) 5) <br /> Treasurer Check for Taxes owed I a-lc i c 02 711(o , oL 711'7, 'D-7 HE <br /> $ <br /> -771-° <br /> / , P1,64... , ////o/a o - "`" <br /> SIGNATURE OF REVIEWER: _ _ DATE: //A3771 Z49 <br /> / <br /> \production\SURVEY\MISC ITEMS\Review Docs\CSM checksheet May_2018 <br />