Laserfiche WebLink
Surveyor checks these after GIS review <br /> ath check each lot and add all parts to be sure totals are correct. <br /> oes proposed CSM fit with the parcel map, if available? <br /> e all structures,bodies of water,wetlands, slopes over 20%, floodplain areas,recorded easements and covenants <br /> yon the site and adjoiners shown?BC Ord. 58-52 (b) <br /> /(//f(Does the CSM cross a section line,40 line or Gov't Lot line?If so,make sure the corresponding data is shown. <br /> RPL Review—Surveyor/Zoning looks into any issues <br /> J Reconciles with Real Property Listing—Comments Tec ID Tri(09 <br /> 0. Does this CSM cross the exterior boundary of a recorded plat?236.34(1) <br /> - Are additional parcels being created? <br /> - Are owner's certificates from all parties of interest included? <br /> • Has the CSM been approved by all approving authorities like a plat? <br /> - Is it monumented the same as a plat with bigger monuments at corners? <br /> MA Has there been an adjacent CSM recorded with 4 parcels of 11/2 acres each or less within a period of 5 years? <br /> 236.02(12) <br /> le, Is the parcel in MFL? <br /> No Does CSM change or cross school or other taxing districts? <br /> J Parcel Identification Number(s): p1-0110-a- -►r1-a3-aoa-003-O«oe° <br /> f Lot Number with improvements—Comments fl vacant lani <br /> Treasurer Review—(Let Surveyor know about delinquency) <br /> V Treasurer Check for Taxes owed 07.0-14 -ZD /076? <br /> OF REVIEWER: IF <br /> DATE: /1 3Jdif <br /> SIGNATURE �`. <br /> \production\SURVEY\MISC ITEMS\Review Docs\CSM checksheet May_2018 <br />