Laserfiche WebLink
Surveyor checks these after GIS review <br /> Math check each lot and add all parts to be sure totals are correct. <br /> V6oes the proposed CSM fit with the parcel map, if available? <br /> lre all structures,bodies of water,wetlands, slopes over 20%, floodplain areas,recorded easements and covenants <br /> on t e site and adjoiners shown?BC Ord. 58-52 (b) <br /> oes the CSM cross a section line,40 line or Gov't Lot line?If so,make sure the corresponding data is shown. <br /> RPL Review-Surveyor/Zoning looks into any issues <br /> J Reconciles with Real Property Listing-Comments -c Mpg 3=54''18 <br /> N, Does this CSM cross the exterior boundary of a recorded plat?236.34(1) <br /> - Are additional parcels being created? <br /> - Are owner's certificates from all parties of interest included? <br /> - Has the CSM been approved by all approving authorities like a plat? <br /> - Is it monumented the same as a plat with bigger monuments at corners? <br /> No Has there been an adjacent CSM recorded with 4 parcels of 1 '/2 acres each or less within a period of 5 years? <br /> 236.02(12) <br /> No Is the parcel in MFL? <br /> No Does CSM change or cross school or other taxing districts? 1 <br /> J Parcel Identification Number(s):On-arta-z-40-16-01.-5 05-002.-OlkSO0 u <br /> 01-02.0-2-40 -ho-02-5 O5-002 - t2OO 35\+-1'--5 <br /> 01-020- Z-40-ib-02-5 o5-00z-ok13OO <br /> ./ Lot Number with improvements-Comments all Icsl'S contain rr -t . i [eJaneni-S• <br /> Treasurer Review-(Let Surveyor know about delinquency) <br /> /Treasurer Check for Taxes owed 12 4L. Z S /aZ 4,), svF- I a.g c" <br /> 74,0 V' Ck�c z c-,� / 8 4- 1 8 Lf S— l//i v/ c - <br /> SIGNATURE OF REVIEWER: fm& DATE: //// OD <br /> \production\SURVEY\MISC ITEMS\Review Docs\CSM checksheet May_2018 <br />