Laserfiche WebLink
/ Surveyor checks these after GIS review <br /> 1/ check each lot and add all parts to be sure totals are correct. <br /> `" D s the proposed CSM fit with the parcel map, if available? <br /> Are all structures,bodies of water,wetlands, slopes over 20%, floodplain areas,recorded easements and covenants <br /> /roesthe site and adjoiners shown?BC Ord. 58-52 (b) <br /> the CSM cross a section line,40 line or Gov't Lot line?If so, make sure the corresponding data is shown. <br /> RPL Review-Surveyor/Zoning looks into any issues <br /> J Reconciles with Real Property Listing-Comments -(ax los 111018 , t2b19, 1'j bcx), 1 1 <br /> No Does this CSM cross the exterior boundary of a recorded plat?236.34(1) <br /> HD Are additional parcels being created? <br /> - Are owner's certificates from all parties of interest included? <br /> Has the CSM been approved by all approving authorities like a plat? <br /> - Is it monumented the same as a plat with bigger monuments at corners? <br /> 11/410 Has there been an adjacent CSM recorded with 4 parcels of 1 %z acres each or less within a period of 5 years? <br /> 236.02(12) <br /> t3+, Is the parcel in MFL? <br /> No Does CSM change or cross school or other taxing districts? <br /> Parcel Identification Numbers :�- Z 1�lb-ar -5 <br /> I ( ) o �q-1b-alo-5 15-oA3-OaB= <br /> 0 -018-a-39-110-db-5 t5-CAS-GaROao <br /> oh-CA-a-3a-t6-ab-5 15-04:13-030oC:)0 <br /> f Lot Number with improvements-Comments all Ick cj rrkain improver erns. <br /> Treasurer Review-(Let Surveyor know about delinquency) <br /> ✓Treasurer Check for Taxes owe 1 SalVA- jyr <br /> ii,„, 4iQ _?1,,,,,,/,,,,-- l a-la9/aoaa <br /> SIGNATURE OF REVIEWER: DATE: / 3�1?-49 Z.O <br /> \production\SURVEY\MISC ITEMS\Review Docs\CSM checksheet May_2018 <br />