Laserfiche WebLink
Surveyor checks these after GIS review <br /> h check each lot and add all parts to be sure totals are correct. <br /> es the proposed CSM fit with the parcel map, if available? <br /> j/ Are all structures,bodies of water,wetlands, slopes over 20%, floodplain areas, recorded easements and covenants <br /> n the site and adjoiners shown?BC Ord. 58-52(b) <br /> Does the CSM cross a section line,40 line or Gov't Lot line?If so,make sure the corresponding data is shown. <br /> iii <br /> RPL Review—Surveyor/Zoning looks into any issues <br /> 4 Reconciles with Real Property Listing—Comments -rex ins '1465 4 1Nc(o <br /> .io Does this CSM cross the exterior boundary of a recorded plat?236.34(1) <br /> - Are additional parcels being created? <br /> - Are owner's certificates from all parties of interest included? <br /> - Has the CSM been approved by all approving authorities like a plat? <br /> - Is it monumented the same as a plat with bigger monuments at corners? <br /> ►3, Has there been an adjacent CSM recorded with 4 parcels of 1 %2 acres each or less within a period of 5 years? <br /> 236.02 (12) <br /> N, Is the parcel in MFL? <br /> hie Does CSM change or cross school or other taxing districts? <br /> J Parcel Identification Number(s):tn.n1a_a_4o_i5-13-6 ‘$-d-1o-0370043 <br /> O1-019-a- 4O- I5- 13-5 t5-Q-70 -038000 <br /> J Lot Number with improvements—Comments j, ( ha,, ;we ro'cwle_vv <br /> Treasurer Review—(Let Surveyor know about delinquency) <br /> / Treasurer Check for Taxes owed TG{/ -.e, C.(we.r <br /> gyliden - If ce... cz -21?` 1c)/a3/6Cao <br /> SIGNATURE OF REVIEWER: DATE: /2730/Zv 240 <br /> \production\SURVEY\MISC ITEMS\Review Docs\CSM checksheet May_2018 <br />