Laserfiche WebLink
Surveyor checks these after GIS review <br /> I/Math check each lot and add all parts to be sure totals are correct. <br /> 1Ar/ `" es the proposed CSM fit with the parcel map, if available? <br /> e all structures,bodies of water,wetlands, slopes over 20%, floodplain areas, recorded easements and covenants <br /> on the site and adjoiners shown?BC Ord. 58-52 (b) <br /> !"fl Does the CSM cross a section line, 40 line or Gov't Lot line?If so,make sure the corresponding data is shown. <br /> RPL Review-Surveyor/Zoning looks into any issues <br /> x Reconciles with Real Property Listing-Comments Tax 1p9 VVIA3 , 1ga9,¢ <br /> nla Does this CSM cross the exterior boundary of a recorded plat?236.34(1) <br /> Are additional parcels being created? <br /> - Are owner's certificates from all parties of interest included? <br /> - Has the CSM been approved by all approving authorities like a plat? <br /> - Is it monumented the same as a plat with bigger monuments at corners? <br /> '4, Has there been an adjacent CSM recorded with 4 parcels of 1 '/z acres each or less within a period of 5 years? <br /> 236.02 (12) <br /> No Is the parcel in MFL? <br /> tJo Does CSM change or cross school or other taxing districts? <br /> It Parcel Identification Number(s): 01-022-Z 40-i A-\q-5 05-00'1-U\\000 <br /> 01-028-1.-4o-t4-t9-,5 05-Cry-1-o\a..cco <br /> A Lot Number with improvements-Comments gtparcels are ,i&6n+tared. <br /> Treasurer Review-(Let Surveyor know about delinquency) <br /> /Treasurer Check for Taxes owed . A> // _A,/ 1, <br /> P <br /> a. <br /> r1' - Ce. ' St lbw/aCJz), <br /> SIGNATURE OF REVIEWER: DATE: z�I?/Z49 Z <br /> \production\SURVEY\MISC ITEMS\Review Docs\CSM checksheet May_2018 <br />