My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Birch Island Lake Assoc 09/28/2022
Burnett-County
>
Property Files
>
0-MANUAL SCANS
>
0-VOYAGER VILLAGE MISC
>
Birch Island Lake Assoc 09/28/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/3/2022 3:57:28 PM
Creation date
10/3/2022 3:57:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Property Files v2
Document Date
9/28/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
BIRCH <br /> 1SL A NDI flE © ll9l <br /> LAKE OCT 3 2022 <br /> 9/28/2022 Burnett ounty <br /> Land Services Department <br /> Voyager Village Dock Proposal—2022 <br /> As submitted by the Birch Island Lake Association <br /> To the Burnett County Zoning Board: <br /> Thank you for taking the time to review the attached materials. As you will see, our Association,which <br /> represents a majority of Birch Island Lake owners, is in strong opposition to the expansion of Voyager <br /> Village docking and marinas. We have enclosed several documents supporting our stance on this issue. <br /> There has been a long history of conflict regarding Voyager Village's history of demands. <br /> We,as an association and tax paying homeowners, are here with one simple ask.... Nothing. We are <br /> asking for nothing to change. We are here to only ask that Voyager Village uphold their end of the most <br /> recent Planned Use Development(PUD)Agreement. They have broken their agreement concerning the <br /> number of docks allowed by the County twice now. We are merely asking that they hold up their end of <br /> the agreement limiting the number of docks per the PUD last approved. <br /> The following summary of documents and facts reinforce why the current agreement should be upheld. <br /> There may be some repetition, but I did not want to break up the submitted documents. <br /> Attachments: <br /> A. Birch Island Lake Association Survey Results—A survey was conducted after Voyager Village <br /> made a request for support from the Birch Island Lake Association. The results showed 83% <br /> against and 17%in favor. Please note,Voyager Village Members can be Birch Island Lake <br /> Association members. VIEW <br /> B. Town of Scott Objection—Letter from the Town of Scott unanimously objecting to the proposal <br /> made by Voyager Village for additional docks. VIEW <br /> C. PUD Developers Agreement—Voyager Village PUD Agreement from 1996 agreeing to no <br /> additional docking on Birch Island Lake. (This Agreement was breached in 2002 when they <br /> added additional docks). VIEW <br /> D. Weld Riley Letter to Jason Towne— Letter from the law firm of Weld Riley which represents the <br /> Birch Island Lake Association as well as individuals on Birch Island Lake. VIEW <br /> E. Weld Riley Letter to Voyager Village Attorney- Letter from the law firm of Weld Riley which <br /> represents the Birch Island Lake Association as well as individuals on Birch Island Lake. VIEW <br /> F. Letter from Corporate Counsel of Burnett County—Letter to Voyager Village from Burnett <br /> County Counsel (David Grindell) summarizing Voyager Village's limitation to 30 docking slips on <br /> Birch Island Lake as per the zoning change in 2002. VIEW <br /> G. Letter or Objection from Larry Peterson—Larry Peterson represents the Loon Lake Property <br /> Owners Association. VIEW <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.